Palo alto networks vpn passthrough ports

Site B: One Cisco 1921 WAN port (192.168.2.2) connected to the ISP router (192.168.2.66), both the Cisco 1921 and the ISP's router are doing NAT. Now one particular tunnel has failed and won' t come up. Issue A site-to-site IPSec VPN between a Palo Alto Networks firewall and a firewall from a different vendor is configured. I found the Arch Linux L2TP wiki helpful & the instructions although for OpenSwan also work on StrongSwan. VPNs and NAT for Cisco Networks A CCIE v5 guide to. I tested the Palo Alto GlobalProtect app on my iPhone, but also the native IPsec Cisco VPN-Client on iOS which connects to the GlobalProtect Gateway on a Palo Alto firewall, too. For example The screenshot below shows devices 198.51.100.1 and 203.0.113.1 (10.0.0.1 internally) as the vpn peers. But this time I am using a virtual tunnel interface (VTI) on the Cisco router which makes the whole VPN set a 'route-based VPN'. NAT translation is enabled in the IKE gateway so it should send it through. The fact is we are discussing the IPSEC tunnel where one site having Cisco Firewall while other site having Palo-Alto PAN firewall.

The diagram is a typical setup where customers hide private IP addresses on their sites by using public addresses and NAT. IPSEC tunnel between Cisco ASA and Palo-Alto PAN Firewalls Today I am going to talk about the IPSEC tunnel between the two remote sites.

Palo alto networks vpn passthrough ports