Dod gig systems engineering oversight process

DOD GIG SYSTEMS ENGINEERING OVERSIGHT PROCESS FULL

(BA 1 & 2) User Needs & Technology Opportunities A B C IOC FOC Process entry points at Milestone A, B, or C Entrance criteria met before entering phase Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability Concept Refinement Technology Development System Integration System Demo LRIP FRP & Deployment Operations & Support Concept Decision Design Readiness Review FRP Decision Review Full-Rate Prod & Deployment Full rate production Deployment of system System Dev & Demonstration Production & Deployment Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment Funding: BA 3/4 BA 5 BA 5/Procurement Proc/Operations & Maintenance CDD CPD Validated & approved by operational validation authority ICD Rqmnts: Increment II B DRR C FRP Increment III B DRR C FRP Conduct AoA, refine initial concept & develop Technology Development Strategy Concept Refinement Reduce technology risk & determine the appropriate set of technologies to be integrated into a full system Demo the technologies in a relevant environment Technology Development Integrate subsystems, complete detailed design, and reduce system-level risk System Integration Complete development Demonstrate ability of system to operate in useful way consistent with KPPs Combined DT/OT System Demonstration Low-Rate Initial Production Create efficient manufacturing capability LRIP IOT&E, LFT&E of prod-rep articlesДЎ1 Systems Engineering As Applied To Concept Refinement SYSTEM LEVEL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS V SYSTEM LEVEL DESIGN SVR SFR ITEMS FAB, INTEGRATE & TEST TRR PDR ITEM LEVEL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ASSEMBLIES COMPONENTS CDR DESIGN REQUIREMENTS COMPLETEДЎ0 The Defense Acquisition Management Framework DoDI 5000.2 (Spring 2003) RISK MANAGEMENT TPM/METRICS COST-PERFORMANCE TRADES TEST EFFECTIVENESS REVIEWS CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL REVIEWS Requirements SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & CONTROL REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS Objectives Track progress Ensure requirements traceability Evaluate alternatives Manage risk FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS & ALLOCATION DESIGN SYNTHESIS Designs Systems Engineering Fundamentals, DAU Press Systems Engineering EffortД©0% Assurance Average Schedule Overrun Source: SECOE 01-03, INCOSE 2002 Systems Engineering EffortД©0% Assurance Average Cost Overrun Source: SECOE 01-03, INCOSE 2002Д§ Schedule Overrun Risk vs.

Substantial efforts and initiatives now underway to fix the problem.Д¦ Cost Overrun Risk vs. Systems engineering capabilities have deteriorated in both government and industry. NASA Accident Experience Current Challenges Related to Technical ManagementДЈ Uneasy Feeling that You are Headed for Trouble?Д¤ Perception Growing realization that systems engineering focus was lost in DoD, NASA, and NRO during last decade. вЂњSpace Shuttle Orbiter.2 Systems Engineering Recent OSD & Service Initiatives вЂњShuttle Structural Dynamics Characteristics, The Analysis and Verification.вЂќД¬ohen, Aaron, and Milton A. вЂњStrength Integrity of the Space Shuttle.вЂќ AIAA-81-2469, November 11-13, 1981, Las Vegas, Nevada. вЂњReliability Engineering of the Space Shuttle: Lessons Learned.вЂќ вЂњOrbiter Structural Design and Verification.вЂќ вЂњStructural Load Challenges During Space Shuttle Development.вЂќ

вЂњAssured Access: вЂThe Bureaucratic Space WarвЂ™.вЂќ вЂњSystem Engineering Fundamentals.вЂќ January 2001.ДЄldridge, E. All reports are courtesy of the person named, and used with permission.Дefense Acquisition University Press. The following is a compilation of documents that relate to the topics presented in class. Arrow_back browse course material library_books

Dod gig systems engineering oversight process